Skip to content

The future accountability of councils?

January 6, 2011

The recent spat between the LGA and CLG on bin collections could be an indication of things to come. Eric Pickles’ dislike of fortnightly bin collections is well known and therefore it is not surprising that the first time waste collections were disrupted would be taken as an opportunity to remind councils of  his position. However, this is a localist Secretary of State and he is not fond of guidance or unnecessary rules. Therefore the tactics deployed might reveal more about the future accountability of councils than the future of waste management in England.

The first tactic was in timing, this was a pre-emptive strike, no national press and barely any local press had picked up waste collection as a problem. The second tactic was to apportion blame to councils and their working practices. I was in Leeds over Christmas, waste collections had been missed but my hosts and their neighbours recognised that snow and sheet ice were the cause not necessarily council practices. The third tactic was to use vaguely threatening language hence Bob Neill’s statement that to ignore him would be not be ‘wise’. Fourthly, is a potential sanction, the reluctant issuance of guidance.

In the absence of an audit commission, the seeming disinterest of the armchair auditors and fewer people in CLG to gather evidence and write guidance could these tactics be the future of local government accountability? Eric Pickles has declared an interest in ‘guided localism’ perhaps this should be ‘nudged localism’. You are free to do whatever you want but if the government don’t like it be prepared to defend yourself at any time on any topic. You can continue to swim against the current of government preference but wouldn’t it just be easier to fall into line and receive supportive letters from government rather than broadsides?

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. David Walker permalink
    January 6, 2011 4:06 pm

    ‘Guided localism’ is an oxymoron. Eric Pickles and Bob Neill are centralists, in the obvious sense they think they can sit on a perch in Eland House and not only see myriad local circumstances but ordain what should happen in local areas. Andy Johnston might have added that the Communities Secretary’s centralism is further strengthened because of the Local Government Association’s weakness and the willingness of its Tory leadership to put party loyalty ahead of local government (perhaps even their own local political) interest. What is desperately missing at the moment is ‘voice’ – for individual councillors or for councillors collectively to speak their opposition to Eric Pickles’ bullying and Bob Neill’s bluster. Occasional interventions by such mavericks as Richard Kemp won’t suffice. The local government story of 2011 – aside from the cuts – must be whether its institutional voice, the LGA, can stop arrest last year’s precipitate decline.

  2. January 7, 2011 10:18 am

    Similar experience in Walthamstow. Due to snow and ice, many smaller residential streets had not had their rubbish/recycling collected for a couple of weeks (we have weekly collections here). On local blogs and press, there was no hoo-ha about it, of course the weather will bring some disruption. Now it’s back to normal, it was a non-story around here.

Trackbacks

  1. Irretrievable breakdown or intolerable cruelty? | Sole Trader PR

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: